Infoblox not updating dns

Because of the TXT record, the hostname is married to the clients MAC.

Now the question is, if there are users who have the need to replace the NIC (built-in or discrete) and use the same hostname, this will be problematic because the hostname is already married to the old NIC (MAC), hence the workstation that was replaced, and renamed, will not get a hostname.

Only static and dynamic record source type support secure dynamic updates.

We could live with that max 1 hour/avg 1/2 hour window of the "wrong" IP in DNS. Are there priorities negotiated between the scopes in terms of DDNS updates, which one "wins"?What I understand is that the client sends L2 broadcast to a DHCP server, with its MAC address and hostname.Then, the DHCP server provides an IP address to the client, and sends an update to DNS with the clients IP MAC Hostname. When you sign in to comment, IBM will provide your email, first name and last name to DISQUS.That information, along with your comments, will be governed by DISQUS’ privacy policy.

Leave a Reply